editorial from The Wall Street Journal is expressing strong disapproval of President Trump's decision to revoke Secret Service protection for several of his former top aides, including John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and Brian Hook. The board emphasizes the risks these individuals face, particularly given ongoing threats from Iran. 

torial from The Wall Street Journal is expressing strong disapproval of President Trump's decision to revoke Secret Service protection for several of his former top aides, including John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and Brian Hook. The board emphasizes the risks these individuals face, particularly given ongoing threats from Iran. 


The piece highlights a broader concern regarding the safety of officials who serve in the U.S. government, suggesting that such actions reflect poorly on Trump’s consideration for his former associates and could have serious consequences if any harm were to come to them. It questions Trump's rationale for discontinuing protection, implying that the current and ongoing threats warrant continued security measures, especially considering their past roles in sensitive government positions.




FREE ONLINE TUITION FULL TIME AND PART TIME  SEE MORE  :https://www.profitablecpmrate.com/u3b8c50ib?key=6c562ca8d5271ea64060af942eb35dce




Trump's reasoning for his decision—stating that individuals should not expect lifelong security—does not resonate well with the editorial board, which underscores that this situation may have long-term implications not only for the former aides but also for the current Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, who may view Trump's actions as a lack of support for his predecessors. The editorial suggests that if any violence were to occur against these figures, Trump might bear some responsibility, further complicating his leadership image.

The piece highlights a broader concern regarding the safety of officials who serve in the U.S. government, suggesting that such actions reflect poorly on Trump’s consideration for his former associates and could have serious consequences if any harm were to come to them. It questions Trump's rationale for discontinuing protection, implying that the current and ongoing threats warrant continued security measures, especially considering their past roles in sensitive government positions.


Trump's reasoning for his decision—stating that individuals should not expect lifelong security—does not resonate well with the editorial board, which underscores that this situation may have long-term implications not only for the former aides but also for the current Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, who may view Trump's actions as a lack of support for his predecessors. The editorial suggests that if any violence were to occur against these figures, Trump might bear some responsibility, further complicating his leadership image.