his analysis, Michael Schaffer critiques the recent awarding of the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Presidential Citizens Medal by President Joe Biden, characterizing the selections as politically motivated and reflective of a divide within American society. Schaffer draws parallels to previous administrations, particularly highlighting the contrasting approaches between Biden and Donald Trump.


In Biden's final round of honorees, Schaffer notes that many recipients represent elite sectors—such as media, philanthropy, and Hollywood—raising concerns over whether these selections resonate with the average American. Figures like Anna Wintour and David Rubenstein represent a cosmopolitan image that may alienate many within the electorate, particularly in light of recent electoral failures for the Democratic Party.




FREE  ONLINE  TUITION FULL TIME  And  

PART TIME  SEE MORE  :https://www.profitablecpmrate.com/u3b8c50ib?key=6c562ca8d5271ea64060af942eb35dce

The inclusion of controversial figures, like George Soros, further emphasizes the perceived politicization of the awards, which some Republicans viewed as a "trolling" gesture. Schaffer argues that these choices reflect a trend in contemporary politics where outgoing presidents use such honors to reaffirm alliances and signals their political bias, thereby cheapening the significance of the awards.


Schaffer laments that Biden had the opportunity to restore a more unifying and bipartisan spirit to these honors, reminiscent of past administrations. Instead, the final roster feels like a continuation of divides exacerbated during the Trump presidency, which often celebrated divisive figures and engendered a culture of partisanship.


In summary, Schaffer suggests that while Biden's awardees have achieved notable success in their respective fields, the choices lack the broad appeal and sense of unity that used to characterize such honors, leaving a feeling of disappointment and reinforcing the narrative of disconnection with mainstream America