The article by Gregg Jarrett, a Fox News legal analyst, suggests that Judge Juan Merchan's decision to proceed with sentencing President-elect Donald Trump on January 10, despite the jury's guilty verdict, is motivated by a desire to brand Trump a "convicted felon" before his inauguration. Jarrett argues that the case against Trump is meritless, politically motivated, and lacks sufficient evidence. He claims that Merchan's refusal to dismiss the case is a middle finger to the law and to Trump.


Jarrett suggests that Merchan's offer of an "unconditional discharge" with no incarceration, fine, or probation is a charade meant to bookend a sham trial. He notes that state law does not support a jail sentence under these circumstances and that the prosecution deliberately contorted statutes and mangled evidence to pursue a meritless case.

Free  tuition  online  fulltime  and part time 
See  more :

https://www.profitablecpmrate.com/u3b8c50ib?key=6c562ca8d5271ea64060af942eb35dce



Jarrett argues that Trump should refuse to accept Merchan's offer and instead challenge the verdict on appeal. He notes that Trump has a credible argument that the verdicts against him should be vacated now, citing the federal Constitution, the Presidential Transition Act of 1963, and the interest of justice. Jarrett suggests that sentencing would disrupt the orderly transfer of executive power and that Trump's lawyers have options available to them, such as filing for an emergency "stay" from the appellate courts.


Overall, Jarrett's article presents a strongly negative view of Judge Merchan's decision and the prosecution's case against Trump, portraying it as a politically motivated attempt to tar and feather Trump with a "convicted felon" label before his inauguration.